Why Discovery Calls Are Getting Shorter, and What That Means for Reps

Table of Contents
    Add a header to begin generating the table of contents

    Five years ago, a standard enterprise discovery call ran forty-five minutes to an hour. Today, plenty of buyers across ANZ are pushing back on anything longer than twenty, and some are declining a discovery call altogether in favour of a written brief or a short async video. This shift has crept up on a lot of sales teams, and reps who were trained on the longer format are finding their usual approach doesn’t fit the time they’re actually being given anymore.

    This isn’t buyers being difficult. It’s a direct consequence of how much research they can now do before ever speaking to a rep, and it changes what discovery is actually for.

    Understanding the Importance of Networking in Tech Sales

    Buyers Arrive Already Informed

    The traditional discovery call assumed the buyer knew relatively little about your product and category, and a large chunk of the call was spent establishing basic context: what the product does, who else uses it, how pricing works. That assumption doesn’t hold anymore. Buyers have typically read the website, watched a demo video, checked review sites, and increasingly used AI tools to summarise your positioning against competitors before they ever get on a call.

    This means a rep opening a call with “so tell me a bit about what you’re looking for” is often asking a buyer to repeat information they’ve already made available or could reasonably expect the rep to have found. It reads as either laziness or a scripted process the rep hasn’t adapted, and both cost credibility in the first ninety seconds of the call.

    The reps handling this shift well have restructured their opening from information-gathering to hypothesis-testing. Rather than asking open questions to discover basic context, they arrive with a specific, informed hypothesis about the buyer’s situation and use the call to confirm, correct, or sharpen it. “Based on what I’m seeing, it looks like your evaluation is going to hinge on integration complexity more than price, is that a fair read?” does more work in one sentence than five minutes of generic open questions, and it signals competence immediately.

    Shorter Doesn’t Mean Less Depth, It Means Less Waste

    The mistake some reps make in response to shrinking call length is trying to cram the same volume of questions into a smaller window, which just produces a rushed, checklist-feeling call. The better response is recognising that a chunk of the traditional discovery framework, background context, basic use case explanation, general company information, can now happen before the call through research, forms, or a short pre-call questionnaire, freeing the actual call time for the parts that genuinely require a live conversation: reading tone, probing on ambiguous answers, and building the kind of rapport that written exchange can’t replicate.

    A well-run twenty-minute call that spends its full time on decision criteria, internal politics, and specific pain points will surface more useful information than a forty-five minute call that spends fifteen minutes on background the rep should have already known.

    Understanding the Unique Demands of Tech Sales Resumes

    What This Means for Qualification

    Shorter discovery windows put more pressure on qualification accuracy, because there’s less time to course-correct a poorly qualified conversation mid-call. Reps need to be more deliberate about which questions actually predict deal outcome and prioritise those first, rather than working through a fixed script top to bottom regardless of what the call reveals early on.

    This is where frameworks like MEDDIC earn their keep in a compressed format. Instead of methodically working through every letter in order, strong reps identify which one or two elements are most uncertain or highest-risk for a given deal, based on pre-call research, and spend the majority of live call time there. If the economic buyer is already clearly identified through prior context, spending five minutes confirming it again is wasted time that could go toward understanding decision process, which is often the least visible and highest-risk element in ANZ’s more committee-driven enterprise deals.

    Finding the Best Tech Sales Opportunities

    The ANZ Context Adds a Layer

    ANZ buyers, particularly in mid-market and enterprise segments, tend to value directness and dislike feeling like they’re being taken through a sales process rather than having a genuine conversation. A rep who treats a shortened call as an excuse to speed-run a script rather than adapt it tends to land worse here than in markets more tolerant of an obviously process-driven approach. The compression has to come with genuine adaptation, not just faster delivery of the same generic structure.

    There’s also a practical timezone and access reality specific to this market. With a smaller pool of decision-makers and tighter calendars, especially across dual AU/NZ or AU/Singapore remits, getting even twenty minutes with the right stakeholder can be harder to secure than in larger markets where more people hold adjacent buying influence. That scarcity raises the cost of a wasted or poorly structured call significantly, because the second chance isn’t guaranteed to come easily.

    Adjusting Discovery Structure for a Shorter Format

    Teams adapting well to this shift are generally doing a few consistent things. They’re moving background and context-gathering to pre-call async touchpoints, a short form, a targeted pre-read, or research the rep does independently. They’re training reps to open with an informed point of view rather than a blank-slate question, which immediately signals preparation. And they’re being ruthless about prioritising the two or three highest-risk unknowns in a deal rather than working through a full generic discovery checklist regardless of relevance.

    None of this means discovery matters less. If anything, it matters more, because there’s less room to recover from a poorly run call, and buyers who’ve already invested time researching independently expect the live conversation to add real value rather than repeat what they already know. The reps and teams treating this shift as an opportunity to sharpen their process, rather than a constraint to complain about, are the ones seeing conversion rates hold steady or improve even as average call length keeps shrinking.

     

     

    READY TO TRANSFORM YOUR CAREER OR TEAM

    Whether you’re a professional eyeing your next career move or an employer seeking the best talent, uncover unparalleled IT, sales, and marketing recruitment in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and extending to the broader Australia, Asia-Pacific, and the United States. Pulse Recruitment is your bridge to job opportunities or candidates that align perfectly with your aspirations and requirements. Embark on a journey of growth and success today by getting in touch!

     

    FROM OUR PULSE NEWS, EMPLOYER AND JOB SEEKER HUBS

    Featured Articles

    GTM Tech Sales Hiring Forecast: What to Expect in Late 2026

    Every quarter, GTM leaders across ANZ ask some version of the same question: are we building the right team for what’s coming, or the team that made sense eighteen months ago? Heading into the back half of 2026, the honest answer for most companies is the latter. Team structures built during the growth-at-all-costs years are…

    How to Handle Objections Without Sounding Scripted

    Most objection-handling training teaches reps a set of pre-written responses to the most common pushback: price, timing, “we’re happy with our current vendor,” “I need to check with my team.” The problem isn’t that these responses are wrong, it’s that buyers can tell when they’re hearing a rehearsed line rather than a genuine response to…

    How AI Is Actually Changing the Sales Cycle

    Every sales conference session, every vendor pitch, and a fair share of LinkedIn posts over the past two years have made some version of the claim that AI is transforming sales. Most of these claims are either significantly overstated or so vague they’re impossible to actually evaluate. The real picture is more specific and, in…

    Sales Forecasting: Why Most Forecasts Are Wrong

    Forecast accuracy is one of the most consistently poor metrics across tech sales organisations, and it’s rarely because the underlying methodology is complicated. Most CRM forecasting tools can handle weighted pipeline, stage-based probability, and historical trend analysis without much difficulty. The problem almost never sits with the tooling. It sits with the inputs, the incentives…

    How AI Has Changed Selling: What Top Sales Reps Do Differently

    Ask a candidate in a sales interview whether they use AI and almost everyone says yes. That answer tells a hiring manager nothing. Every rep has ChatGPT open in a browser tab. Every rep has tried a call recording tool that summarises next steps. Using AI is no longer a differentiator. It’s table stakes. What…

    GTM Tech Sales Hiring Forecast: What to Expect Through Late 2026

    GTM hiring is not collapsing. It is sorting itself into two very different markets, and most people are still planning as if only one of them exists. Overall GTM job postings across US digital native companies fell 15% in Q1 2026 compared to the same period last year, and that pullback continued into April. At…

    How to Write Cold Emails That Get Responses

    Most cold emails fail before the reader gets to the second sentence. Not because the product is weak. Not because the timing is wrong. They fail because the email was written to explain the sender’s company instead of starting a conversation with the reader. Open almost any inbox and the pattern repeats itself. A paragraph…

    How to Scale a GTM Sales Team: A Complete Guide to Building a High-Performing Revenue Engine

    Every high-growth company reaches a point where its early sales strategy stops working. In the beginning, founders often handle sales themselves. They build relationships, close the first customers, and refine the product based on direct customer feedback. This founder-led approach is essential for achieving product-market fit, but it isn’t designed to scale. As demand grows,…

    How to Optimize Your Sales GTM Funnel

    Every GTM team has a funnel. Very few teams actually know where theirs is leaking. Leadership looks at top of funnel volume and bottom of funnel revenue, sees a gap between the two, and calls it conversion rate. That number tells you almost nothing about what to actually fix. Optimizing a GTM funnel is not…

    GTM Frameworks Every Sales Team Should Know

    Ask five sales leaders which framework their team uses and you will usually get five different answers, delivered with the same confidence, and at least two of them will not be able to explain why they chose it over the alternatives. Frameworks get adopted because a previous employer used them, because a conference speaker recommended…